Drug Laws are Immoral
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
By Father John Clifton Marquis, S.T.
U.S
Catholic, May 1990
The United States’ federal, state, county and city governments
have spent the last 50 years writing and enacting antidrug laws
with increasingly severe punishments for offenders. These laws are
false gods promising a salvation they cannot produce. Every year,
they demand more adoration from their devotees: more time, more
money, more people, more resources. And yet, no matter how punitive
the sanctions (including the death penalty itself), the drug-providing
business has only escalated; indeed ballooned. This is simple, historical
fact.
Drug laws are a moral issue. Fifty years of drug legislation have
produced the exact opposite effect of what those laws intended:
the laws have created a tantalizingly profitable economic structure
for marketing drugs. When law does not promote the common good,
but in fact causes it to deteriorate, the law itself becomes bad
and must be changed.
The undeniable result of current U.S. drug laws is certainty that
drugs will be very, very expensive. The corollary to that “given”
is that people will commit many and violent sins to control the
money that is to be made.
The moral issue here is to do the very best that can be done to
give the community maximum control over drug availability and consequent
drug use. Society cannot cure every drug abuser or alcoholic; that
is a given. But the community can create a social condition in which
innocent people do not become victims and where health-care professionals
have a better opportunity (with more funds and people available)
to serve the healing process of drug abusers.
The moral principle involved here is very old and very sure: pick
the lesser of two evils. Drug abuse is bad. It is a patent evil
to the person abusing drugs and to everyone connected with him or
her. But drug abuse is a problem that church and society can tackle
and, in many cases, cure or control. In practice, our communities
have the spiritual and psychological tools at hand. However, most
do not have sufficient human and economic resources to use those
tools effectively to help the people who desperately need them.
The overwhelming majority of these resources are mainlined into
a self-abortive policing effort that, by its very nature, cannot
succeed.
Drug use and abuse clearly are serious problems. Yet a more intrusive
and caustic moral illness results from the presence of drugs in
the United States: greed. Greed is a much more subtle evil that
the immaturity that leads to substance abuse. Like a cancer, it
produces ancillary evils as destructive as its root. The people
of the United States know by daily experience the destructive and
havoc wreaked upon their lives by drug provides. This is the moral
evil that must be erased.
I am painfully aware that, for many millions of U.S. citizens, the
very mention of completely legalizing drugs sounds like a form of
blasphemy. That is why I deliberately described current U.S. drug
laws as false gods. They are blasphemy. They are the idolatrous
Frankenstein that elected officials have created. They make the
drug trade incredibly lucrative. Neither police action nor the appointment
of drug czars will faze the drug lords. As a nation, the United
States may well arrest and convict thousands of dealers. Law enforcement
agencies can incarcerate them all at disastrous cost to the public.
For the kind of economic profit illegal drugs provide, however,
there will always be other losers that take their places. The kingpins
will go on.
Moral leaders have no alternative but to choose between authentic
morality, which produces good, and cosmetic morality, which merely
looks good. Drug laws look good! But the tragic flaw of cosmetic
morality, like all other forms of cosmetics, is that it produces
no change of substance.
Proponents of cosmetic morality would rather look good than pay
the tough, personal price of doing good. Authentic morality knows
its limitations in the human condition and does all it can for the
common good.
Some people are convinced that any and every problem can be solved
with just a little more firepower. Yet the United States already
has the third highest rate of incarceration in the world, following
only South Africa and the Soviet Union. Continued enforcement of
drug laws may make us number one. Funds needed for education and
health care will be stripped away to maintain police agencies and
prisons. U.S. liberties and judicial process are endangered because
of a growing mania to win in court one way or another. Authentic
moral leaders cannot afford the arrogant luxury of machismo, with
its refusal to consider not “winning.” Winning, the
case for drug abuse, is finding the direction and methods that provide
the maximum amount of health and safety to the whole society without
having a cure that is worse than the disease.
The fact is that the United States never had organized crime until
Prohibition. Illegal (and thus very expensive) alcohol created a
new economic market with hoodlums machine-gunning one another to
death over profits. The percentage of U.S. citizens who drank hard
liquor actually increased after alcohol was outlawed. When alcohol
became legal again, the now-organized crime syndicate simply picked
up the drug trade.
The standard argument against the legalization of drugs (all drugs,
across the board) is: “It will make people, especially young
people, think drugs are good.” The people involved in drug
dealing and drug using already think they are good. They are acquiring
the money or pleasure so highly prized by the U.S. culture. At this
point, what is imperative for leaders in the United States to realize
how young people think about good and bad. As a culture, U.S. youth
do not equate illegal with immoral. Within their culture (and their
experience of what adults have been doing with laws for the last
generation), illegal simply means “harder to get,” “forbidden
fruit,” or “adult toy.” The United States has
some laws for the protection of human life. What does that teach
young people about the law? Law may very well have been a teacher
of good and bad for Saint Paul and Saint Thomas Aquinas, but it
is hardly that for U.S. youth.
Another popular argument (and gross misconception) is that legal
drugs will be too available. The reality is that U.S. grade schools
and prisons are two of the hottest areas of drug trade. How much
more available can the stuff become?
Legalizing all drugs in the United States would have one immediate
and dramatic effect: it would render them cheap. In today’s
market, a kilogram of illegal heroin or illegal cocaine has a street
value of several million dollars. A kilogram of illegal marijuana
has a street value of about a quarter million dollars. A kilogram
of legal cocaine would be worth perhaps a couple hundred dollars
and a kilogram of legal marijuana would be price with expensive
tobacco. As long as drugs are illegal, the obscenity of the pricing
structure will perdure. Legal drugs do not drug lords make. Legal
drugs eradicate the reason for violence to control the trade.
There is no doubt that some people will abuse legal drugs; this
happens with legal alcohol. It is also a sad human fact that some
very sober and reasonable people drive cars recklessly; gamble away
their hard earned money; use the gift of speech to spread slander,
calumny, and gossip; and go on to do a great variety of inappropriate
and sinful things. Human nature is, after all, wounded by the reality
of sin. But lawmaking is not now, and never has been, the magic
formula for goodness.
The problems, hurts, and difficulties that will definitely result
from legalized drugs will be far, far less numerous and less destructive
to the whole society than theft, bribery, violence, murder, mayhem,
and self-degradation that are daily bread in the United States today.
U.S. citizens must have the integrity and the painful honesty to
keep in the forefront of their minds that they are not preventing
addiction to crack or any other drug at this time. The current methods
are not working. Humility, not arrogance, will help society find
the best way to reach its goal, which is common good.
The authentic definition of humility is truth.
Interfaith
Drug Policy
Initiative, P.O. Box 6299, Washington,
D.C. 20015
Phone: 301-270-4473 Fax: 301-270-4483 |
|