Treatment, not Incarceration
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
by Reverend Clare Petersberger
A homily delivered on February 29, 2005
Towson Unitarian Universalist Church, MD
When I was an eighth grade student, policemen were invited to an
assembly in my school to talk to students about illegal drugs. I
remember two things from this assembly. The first was watching the
police dog---brought as part of the show-and-tell---sniff out drugs
the police had planted in the bleachers. The second was hearing
one of the policeman say that if any of us were ever at a party
where marijuana was being smoked, and the police were called, even
if we weren’t the ones smoking the drug, we would be accountable
for aiding and abetting others engaged in an illegal activity. We
would very likely be taken to the police station, along with those
engaged in using an illegal substance, and booked for a crime. We
were warned that if that happened, it would be on record for many,
many years. This was my introduction, at the age of 13, to our national
war on drugs---not long after it had been launched.
Within three years, I was attending parties at the homes of high
school friends
where parents provided kegs of beer and bottles of wine for our
consumption. I remember thinking, “We could get a criminal
record for smoking pot. But adults are providing us with alcohol---a
drug---even though we’re not 18. What’s wrong with this
picture?” By then I knew that my peers were ignoring the prohibition
against growing, buying, and smoking marijuana as much as their
parents were ignoring the prohibition against serving minors alcoholic
beverages.
This past year, I’ve been reminded, frequently of the failure
of our nation’s war on drugs. I’ve been serving on a
subcommittee of the League Of Women Voters
studying the problem of drug abuse in Baltimore County.
We interviewed the head of the Baltimore County Police Vice and
Narcotics Squad. He reported that there are 25 full time investigators
in the Baltimore County Police force and three part time investigators.
Last year 290 search warrants were served by the Narcotics Unit.
He could easily use 100 more investigators and still have a sizable
case-load.
We met with Judge Cox, who launched a pilot Juvenile Drug Court
program.
There are currently 11 adolescents working through the program.
With Federal funding, there could easily be 100 teens enrolled.
We met with those who run a for profit, minimum security program,
those who run a private out patient counseling and drug treatment
center, and those who run a methadone clinic. They all stressed
that addiction to any drug, legal or illegal is, at its root, a
medical problem, a disease, and should be treated as such. But in
Baltimore County, there is only one criminal justice residential
treatment center and one public general treatment center. These
facilities provide 258 beds for detox
and 50 beds for those moving through the criminal justice system.
Several thousand people are turned away from treatment, each day.
There are estimated to be almost 233,00 people in need of treatment
in the state of Maryland.
The real kicker is that treatment is much more cost effective than
incarceration.
In Baltimore, it costs $23,000 a year to keep those imprisoned for
using drugs in jail. Treatment for these same individuals would
cost between 5,000 and $8,500 dollars. Given that the re-incarceration
rate for inmates who have had no treatment is 50% while the recidivism
rate of those who have lived in a therapeutic community is only
8%, it is not hard to do the cost/benefit analysis of treatment
over incarceration.
Thus I’m not surprised to find myself agreeing with William
Buckley on this issue.
Mr. Buckley wrote, “It transpires that treatment is seven
times more cost effective than incarceration. By this is meant that
one dollar spent on the treatment of an addict reduces the probability
of continued addiction seven times more than one dollar spent on
incarceration…Yet we are willing to build more and more jails
in which to isolate the drug user…”
I am so grateful to Mr. Sterling for coming to come speak to us,
and rousing us to action. Our public policy of criminalizing users
of certain drugs makes even less sense to me, today, than it did
30 years ago. I know that there but for the grace of God, go I along
with those peers whom I watched smoking pot. I know that there but
for the grace of God, go many with whom I’ve ministered who
have wrestled with physical, emotional, and spiritual addictions.
I know that there but for the grace of God go many of our youth
who are no more shielded by society from experimenting with drugs---both
legal and illegal---than I was 30 years ago.
I know, therefore, that whether or not we all agree with the Unitarian
Universalist Statement of Conscience in it’s entirety, whether
or not we are for decriminalizing, regulating, or even legalizing
drugs that are currently illegal, there are steps each and every
one of us can take to support treating addictions.
Our opening words pointed to some of these ways---from writing letters
to representatives pointing out the senselessness of criminalizing
some forms of addiction while tolerating others….to nurturing
a religious community where people of all ages can find meaning,
hope, and grace through shared values, stories, and service. “Let
neither fear nor any other barrier prevent us from advocating a
more just, compassionate world.”
Interfaith
Drug Policy
Initiative, P.O. Box 6299, Washington,
D.C. 20015
Phone: 301-270-4473 Fax: 301-270-4483 |
|